- This topic is empty.
-
-
I wanted to share some updates about a situation that recently unfolded at the Federal High Court in Abuja. It’s a pretty serious matter involving accusations of plotting to remove President Bola Tinubu by unconstitutional means.
Here’s What Happened:
The Inspector General of Police (IGP) has accused ten Nigerian protesters of conspiring with a British citizen, Andrew Martin Wynne (also known as Andrew Povich), to destabilize Nigeria and intimidate President Tinubu. This was brought up during the #EndBadGovernance protests, and it involves some heavy allegations.
Details From the Court:
According to the charge sheet, the IGP’s counsel, Simon Lough SAN, claimed that the defendants and others who are still at large were working with Wynne in Abuja, Kaduna, Kano, and Gombe. They’re accused of inciting mutiny, attacking police officers, burning police stations, and even trying to force their way into places like the Abacha Army Barracks and the Government House in Kano.
One notable point is that the police said these actions were meant to incite a military takeover, which is a huge allegation. They also mentioned that Wynne allegedly sold a book titled “Revolution is the Choice of the People” for N200 to stir up the protesters.
Court Proceedings:
The accused pleaded not guilty to all charges, and their lawyers requested bail, arguing that everyone is presumed innocent until proven guilty. They highlighted the health conditions of some defendants and the pregnancy of one woman as reasons for bail. However, the prosecution opposed, emphasizing that bail should only be granted in exceptional cases.
The judge has set September 11 for a ruling on the bail application and possibly hearing the case further.
More Context:
This development comes after a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Femi Falana, filed a motion to quash a 60-day remand order against 49 Nigerians who had protested against public fund looting. Falana argued that the protesters were exercising their right to peaceful protest and should not be remanded on accusations of terrorism without conclusive evidence.
What’s Next?
The court is expected to make further decisions on this case soon. It’s a complex situation that brings up several important issues about the right to protest, government response, and how we interpret actions as either democratic or seditious.
What Do You Think?
This case is stirring a lot of debates and raising some serious questions about our rights and the power dynamics at play. I’d love to hear your thoughts on this. Do you think the charges are justified, or is this an overreach? Let’s discuss!
Looking forward to your input!
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.